Screener
OUSM vs DFLV
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- DFLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- DFLV is significantly larger than OUSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OUSM follows a index tracking strategy; DFLV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OUSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | DFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $5.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | 11.35% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -16.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and DFLV
Explore further