Screener
PBUS vs RPG
Invesco MSCI USA ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- PBUS costs 0.31% less per year.
- PBUS is significantly larger than RPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBUS | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.24% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -33.15% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBUS and RPG
Explore further