Screener
PCRB vs GKAT
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
PCRB is a fixed income ETF, while GKAT is an equity ETF. PCRB charges 0.36% a year and GKAT 0.59%.
- PCRB is a fixed income fund, while GKAT is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- PCRB follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- PCRB covers North America; GKAT covers global markets.
- PCRB costs 0.23% less per year.
- GKAT is much larger than PCRB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $165M |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 9.74% | 0.45% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.75% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -10.41% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.