Screener
PWER vs EMEQ
Nomura Energy Transition ETF vs Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both PWER and EMEQ are equity ETFs. PWER charges 0.80% a year and EMEQ 0.86%. The main difference: PWER follows a index tracking strategy; EMEQ uses active selection.
- PWER follows a index tracking strategy; EMEQ uses active selection.
- PWER covers North America; EMEQ covers emerging markets.
- PWER costs 0.06% less per year.
- EMEQ is much larger than PWER. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWER | EMEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.86% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $623M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.8% | +129.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.72% | 34.36% |
| Max drawdown | -29.67% | -19.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.