Screener
PY vs KONG
Principal Value ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.74% less per year.
- PY is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PY is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PY follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, PY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $22M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and KONG
Explore further