Screener
QFHD vs FDVV
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- FDVV costs 0.34% less per year.
- FDVV is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | FDVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $9.2B |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.10% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -40.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and FDVV
Explore further