Screener
QTAC vs CGBL
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
QTAC is an alternative ETF, while CGBL is a mixed asset ETF. QTAC charges 1.78% a year and CGBL 0.33%.
- QTAC is an alternative fund, while CGBL is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
- CGBL costs 1.45% less per year.
- CGBL is much larger than QTAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.86% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -11.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.