Screener
QVMS vs RPV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.20% less per year.
- RPV is significantly larger than QVMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMS | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.8% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.73% | 12.77% |
| Max drawdown | -28.05% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMS and RPV
Explore further