Screener
REK vs ONLN
ProShares Short Real Estate vs ProShares Online Retail ETF
Key differences
Both REK and ONLN are equity ETFs. REK charges 0.95% a year and ONLN 0.58%. The main difference: REK follows a inverse strategy; ONLN uses index tracking.
- REK follows a inverse strategy; ONLN uses index tracking.
- REK covers North America; ONLN covers global markets.
- ONLN costs 0.37% less per year.
- ONLN is much larger than REK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ONLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- REK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REK | ONLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $66M |
| Since | 2010 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.29% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.6% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.7% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.5% | -6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.41 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 23.81% |
| Max drawdown | -58.67% | -71.77% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.