Screener
RFFC vs FORH
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
RFFC is an equity ETF, while FORH is an alternative ETF. RFFC charges 0.48% a year and FORH 1.19%.
- RFFC is an equity fund, while FORH is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
- RFFC costs 0.71% less per year.
- Over the last three years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $20M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.25% | 15.98% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -20.73% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.