Screener
RFFC vs LST
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Leuthold Select Industries ETF
Key differences
Both RFFC and LST are equity ETFs. RFFC charges 0.48% a year and LST 0.65%. The main difference: RFFC costs 0.17% less per year.
- RFFC costs 0.17% less per year.
- LST is much larger than RFFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- LST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | LST | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $171M |
| Since | 2016 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.25% | 14.61% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -19.47% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.