Screener
RGLO vs MEMA
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
RGLO is an equity ETF, while MEMA is an alternative ETF. RGLO charges 0.49% a year and MEMA 0.85%.
- RGLO is an equity fund, while MEMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; MEMA uses long short.
- RGLO covers global markets; MEMA covers emerging markets.
- RGLO costs 0.36% less per year.
- RGLO is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $330M | $13M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.93% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -13.12% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.