Screener
ROM vs CLIX
ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
Key differences
Both ROM and CLIX are equity ETFs. ROM charges 0.95% a year and CLIX 0.65%. The main difference: ROM follows a leveraged strategy; CLIX uses inverse.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; CLIX uses inverse.
- CLIX costs 0.30% less per year.
- ROM is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | CLIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $7M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +120.8% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +52.7% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +28.8% | -6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.31% | 21.01% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -73.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.