Screener
ROM vs ONLN
ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares Online Retail ETF
Key differences
Both ROM and ONLN are equity ETFs. ROM charges 0.95% a year and ONLN 0.58%. The main difference: ROM follows a leveraged strategy; ONLN uses index tracking.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; ONLN uses index tracking.
- ROM covers North America; ONLN covers global markets.
- ONLN costs 0.37% less per year.
- ROM is much larger than ONLN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | ONLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $66M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +120.8% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +52.7% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +28.8% | -6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.31% | 23.81% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -71.77% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.