Screener
RULE vs XRLX
Adaptive Core ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.64% less per year.
- XRLX is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $51M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and XRLX
Explore further