Screener
RUSC vs AFLG
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- AFLG costs 0.09% less per year.
- AFLG is significantly larger than RUSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RUSC follows a index tracking strategy; AFLG uses active selection.
- AFLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RUSC | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $609M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.9% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.14% | 11.60% |
| Max drawdown | -9.18% | -35.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RUSC and AFLG
Explore further