Screener
RWL vs QQMG
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQMG costs 0.19% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than QQMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QQMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | QQMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $187M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -35.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and QQMG
Explore further