Screener
SBND vs CGSD
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD is significantly larger than SBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBND follows a index tracking strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBND | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $202M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.54% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.50% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -10.53% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBND and CGSD
Explore further