Screener
SBND vs CRUX
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- SBND costs 0.07% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than SBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBND follows a index tracking strategy; CRUX uses active selection.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBND | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $202M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.54% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.50% | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.53% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBND and CRUX
Explore further