Screener
SCCR vs BLV
Schwab Core Bond ETF vs Vanguard Long-Term Bond Fund
Key differences
- BLV costs 0.13% less per year.
- BLV is significantly larger than SCCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCCR follows a active selection strategy; BLV uses index tracking.
- BLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCCR | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $8.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.47% | 4.77% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -3.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.84% | 8.33% |
| Max drawdown | -2.81% | -38.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCCR and BLV
Explore further