Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SCHE vs MEM

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

SCHE

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$12.3B

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$53M

Key differences

  • SCHE costs 0.72% less per year.
  • SCHE is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SCHE follows a index tracking strategy; MEM uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SCHE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SCHEMEM
Annual cost (TER)0.07%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$12.3B$53M
Since20102022
Dividend yield2.67%3.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+26.2%+52.4%
CAGR 3Y+17.3%+23.2%
CAGR 5Y+5.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.841.04
Volatility 1Y16.11%20.59%
Max drawdown-36.16%-19.10%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SCHE and MEM