Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SCHE vs MEMX

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

SCHE

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$12.3B

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

Key differences

  • SCHE costs 0.72% less per year.
  • SCHE is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SCHE follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SCHE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SCHEMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.07%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$12.3B$45M
Since20102023
Dividend yield2.67%1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+26.2%+62.2%
CAGR 3Y+17.3%+25.6%
CAGR 5Y+5.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.841.20
Volatility 1Y16.11%21.07%
Max drawdown-36.16%-19.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SCHE and MEMX