Screener
SCHR vs TLT
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCHR costs 0.12% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than SCHR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHR | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.0B | $42.9B |
| Since | 2010 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.89% | 4.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.9% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | -2.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | -0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.46% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -16.11% | -48.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHR and TLT
Explore further