Screener
SIVR vs PALL
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF vs abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF
Key differences
Both SIVR and PALL are commodity ETFs. SIVR charges 0.30% a year and PALL 0.60%. The main difference: SIVR costs 0.30% less per year.
- SIVR costs 0.30% less per year.
- SIVR is much larger than PALL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SIVR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIVR | PALL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $754M |
| Since | 2009 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +90.1% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.3% | -5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.2% | -16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 59.35% | 50.63% |
| Max drawdown | -42.42% | -73.63% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.