Screener
SKF vs TTT
ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
Key differences
SKF is an equity ETF, while TTT is a fixed income ETF. SKF charges 0.95% a year and TTT 0.95%.
- SKF is an equity fund, while TTT is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- SKF follows a inverse strategy; TTT uses leveraged.
- Over the last three years, TTT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SKF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SKF | TTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $19M |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.20% | 8.74% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.8% | +0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -26.6% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.1% | +17.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.91 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.28% | 28.91% |
| Max drawdown | -96.51% | -81.76% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.