Screener
SLNZ vs WABF
TCW Senior Loan ETF vs Western Asset Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SLNZ and WABF are fixed income ETFs. SLNZ charges 0.65% a year and WABF 0.35%. The main difference: WABF costs 0.30% less per year.
- WABF costs 0.30% less per year.
- SLNZ is much larger than WABF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLNZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLNZ | WABF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $226M | $16M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 7.50% | 4.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.42% | 3.79% |
| Max drawdown | -2.57% | -5.36% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.