Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SPDF vs AOR

Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

SPDF

Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$18M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

SPDF is an equity ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. SPDF charges 0.69% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • SPDF is an equity fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AOR costs 0.54% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than SPDF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SPDFAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.69%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$18M$3.6B
Since20262008
Dividend yield2.47%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+17.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.7%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.06
Volatility 1Y8.66%
Max drawdown-2.77%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SPDF and AOR