Screener
SPDF vs LGH
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.31% less per year.
- LGH is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while LGH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; LGH uses tactical allocation.
- LGH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $555M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -29.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and LGH
Explore further