Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SUPL vs FITE

ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

SUPL

ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$2M

FITE

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$154M

Key differences

Both SUPL and FITE are equity ETFs. SUPL charges 0.58% a year and FITE 0.45%. The main difference: FITE costs 0.13% less per year.

  • FITE costs 0.13% less per year.
  • FITE is much larger than SUPL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, FITE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FITE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SUPLFITE
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$154M
Since20222017
Dividend yield2.69%0.15%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+30.5%+52.6%
CAGR 3Y+12.8%+32.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+16.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.591.20
Volatility 1Y16.08%25.65%
Max drawdown-24.42%-36.90%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SUPL and FITE