Screener
TBT vs SKF
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury vs ProShares UltraShort Financials
Key differences
TBT is a fixed income ETF, while SKF is an equity ETF. TBT charges 0.93% a year and SKF 0.95%.
- TBT is a fixed income fund, while SKF is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TBT is much larger than SKF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TBT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TBT | SKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.93% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $333M | $15M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.90% | 4.20% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.5% | -3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.0% | -26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.4% | -16.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | -0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.58% | 29.28% |
| Max drawdown | -65.09% | -96.51% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.