Screener
TMAT vs GKAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.23% less per year.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while GKAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $158M |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and GKAT
Explore further