Screener
TMAT vs VOTE
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs TCW Transform 500 ETF
Key differences
TMAT is an alternative ETF, while VOTE is an equity ETF. TMAT charges 0.82% a year and VOTE 0.05%.
- TMAT is an alternative fund, while VOTE is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; VOTE uses index tracking.
- VOTE costs 0.77% less per year.
- VOTE is much larger than TMAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.9% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.00% | 12.40% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -25.70% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.