Screener
TMFC vs FFLV
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- FFLV costs 0.12% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFC covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- TMFC follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
- TMFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $17M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and FFLV
Explore further