Screener
TMFC vs IWN
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.26% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than TMFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and IWN
Explore further