Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TMFC vs MFIG

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF

TMFC

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF

Motley Fool

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$2.0B

MFIG

Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF

Motley Fool

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • TMFC is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • TMFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TMFCMFIG
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$2.0B$9M
Since20182025
Dividend yield0.14%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.7%N/A
CAGR 3Y+28.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+16.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.31N/A
Volatility 1Y13.72%
Max drawdown-33.06%-14.29%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TMFC and MFIG