Screener
TMFM vs TMFC
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFC costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; TMFC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2014 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.4% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.1% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.06 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and TMFC
Explore further