Skip to content
Screener

TRFM vs GSLC

AAM Transformers ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

TRFM

AAM Transformers ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$213M

GSLC

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$15.6B

Key differences

Both TRFM and GSLC are equity ETFs. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and GSLC 0.09%. The main difference: TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.

  • TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
  • GSLC costs 0.40% less per year.
  • GSLC is much larger than TRFM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, TRFM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TRFMGSLC
Annual cost (TER)0.49%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$213M$15.6B
Since20222015
Dividend yield0.13%0.93%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+45.0%+21.4%
CAGR 3Y+29.8%+20.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.031.11
Volatility 1Y23.42%11.97%
Max drawdown-28.40%-33.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to TRFM and GSLC