Screener
TUGN vs FLXR
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs TCW Flexible Income ETF
Key differences
TUGN is an alternative ETF, while FLXR is a fixed income ETF. TUGN charges 0.65% a year and FLXR 0.40%.
- TUGN is an alternative fund, while FLXR is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; FLXR uses active selection.
- TUGN covers North America; FLXR covers global markets.
- FLXR costs 0.25% less per year.
- FLXR is much larger than TUGN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | FLXR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $3.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 10.59% | 5.71% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.91% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -1.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.