Screener
ULST vs INKM
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF vs State Street Income Allocation ETF
Key differences
- ULST costs 0.30% less per year.
- ULST is significantly larger than INKM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ULST is classified as fixed income, while INKM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- ULST follows a index tracking strategy; INKM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, INKM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULST | INKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $600M | $76M |
| Since | 2013 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 4.88% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | 5.98% |
| Max drawdown | -6.20% | -28.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULST and INKM
Explore further