Screener
URTH vs SPGM
iShares MSCI World ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Key differences
- SPGM costs 0.15% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than SPGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | SPGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $1.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.96% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -33.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and SPGM
Explore further