Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USE vs BITC

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund vs Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF

USE

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2M

BITC

Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.88%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

USE is an alternative ETF, while BITC is a fixed income ETF. USE charges 0.79% a year and BITC 0.88%.

  • USE is an alternative fund, while BITC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • USE follows a multi strategy strategy; BITC uses systematic alpha.
  • USE costs 0.09% less per year.
  • BITC is much larger than USE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BITC has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

USEBITC
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.88%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$16M
Since20232023
Dividend yield2.21%3.14%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionglobal
Strategymulti strategysystematic alpha
CAGR 1Y+33.5%-15.1%
CAGR 3Y+17.0%+36.7%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.580.86
Volatility 1Y31.72%25.54%
Max drawdown-26.24%-31.89%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to USE and BITC