Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

UYM vs CTEX

ProShares Ultra Materials vs ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

UYM

ProShares Ultra Materials

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$40M

CTEX

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$7M

Key differences

Both UYM and CTEX are equity ETFs. UYM charges 0.95% a year and CTEX 0.58%. The main difference: UYM follows a leveraged strategy; CTEX uses index tracking.

  • UYM follows a leveraged strategy; CTEX uses index tracking.
  • CTEX costs 0.37% less per year.
  • UYM is much larger than CTEX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • UYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

UYMCTEX
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.58%
Fund size (AUM)$40M$7M
Since20072021
Dividend yield1.23%1.50%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.1%+126.4%
CAGR 3Y+13.5%+12.9%
CAGR 5Y+1.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.430.41
Volatility 1Y33.98%43.31%
Max drawdown-73.31%-70.30%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to UYM and CTEX