Screener
VFVA vs VUG
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares vs Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VUG costs 0.10% less per year.
- VUG is significantly larger than VFVA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VFVA follows a active selection strategy; VUG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VUG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFVA | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $815M | $365.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 0.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.5% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | 15.94% |
| Max drawdown | -48.57% | -35.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFVA and VUG
Explore further