Screener
VWO vs MEMX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- VWO costs 0.73% less per year.
- VWO is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VWO follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VWO | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159.9B | $45M |
| Since | 2005 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.70% | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -36.39% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VWO and MEMX
Explore further