Screener
WABF vs GPRF
Western Asset Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF
Key differences
Both WABF and GPRF are fixed income ETFs. WABF charges 0.35% a year and GPRF 0.45%. The main difference: WABF follows a active selection strategy; GPRF uses index tracking.
- WABF follows a active selection strategy; GPRF uses index tracking.
- WABF costs 0.10% less per year.
- GPRF is much larger than WABF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| WABF | GPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $88M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.80% | 5.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 3.76% |
| Max drawdown | -5.36% | -4.36% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.