Screener
WABF vs SLNZ
Western Asset Bond ETF vs TCW Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
Both WABF and SLNZ are fixed income ETFs. WABF charges 0.35% a year and SLNZ 0.65%. The main difference: WABF costs 0.30% less per year.
- WABF costs 0.30% less per year.
- SLNZ is much larger than WABF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLNZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WABF | SLNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $226M |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.80% | 7.50% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 4.42% |
| Max drawdown | -5.36% | -2.57% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.