Screener
XNAV vs AOA
FundX Aggressive ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 1.12% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2002 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and AOA
Explore further