Screener
ZSB vs CGGO
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
ZSB is an alternative ETF, while CGGO is an equity ETF. ZSB charges 0.59% a year and CGGO 0.47%.
- ZSB is an alternative fund, while CGGO is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- CGGO costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGO is much larger than ZSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZSB | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $11.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +68.3% | +31.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.17 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.52% | 17.53% |
| Max drawdown | -49.26% | -24.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.