Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ZSB vs CGMS

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF

ZSB

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$2M

CGMS

Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$4.9B

Key differences

ZSB is an alternative ETF, while CGMS is a fixed income ETF. ZSB charges 0.59% a year and CGMS 0.39%.

  • ZSB is an alternative fund, while CGMS is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
  • CGMS costs 0.20% less per year.
  • CGMS is much larger than ZSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, CGMS has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ZSBCGMS
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$4.9B
Since20232022
Dividend yield0.81%6.08%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategymulti strategyindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+68.3%+6.4%
CAGR 3Y+5.2%+7.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.170.88
Volatility 1Y26.52%3.44%
Max drawdown-49.26%-4.08%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ZSB and CGMS