Screener
ZSB vs XNAV
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
Both ZSB and XNAV are alternative ETFs. ZSB charges 0.59% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- ZSB costs 0.68% less per year.
- XNAV is much larger than ZSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZSB | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +68.3% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.17 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.52% | 17.43% |
| Max drawdown | -49.26% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.